Blog/Communal solar DHW: sizing in a multi-occupancy building
Energy renovation

April 5, 2026

5 min read

Updated August 6, 2026

Communal solar DHW: the pre-sizing ratios, region by region

Sizing a communal solar DHW installation does not start from the available roof but from the hot water volume consumed in the leanest month. The SOCOL 2021 sheet sets the store volume on that minimum monthly consumption, then derives the collector area through a ratio running from 40 to 100 litres per square metre depending on the third of the country concerned.

Contents

Pre-sizing a communal solar DHW installation is two operations. The solar store volume is taken equal to the minimum monthly daily consumption, ideally measured in spring or autumn. The collector area then follows from a ratio given by the SOCOL 2021 sheet, for a 45° tilt and due south orientation: 40 to 45 litres per square metre in the northern third of France, 50 to 75 in the central third, 70 to 100 in the southern third. The demand basis used for solar is 30 litres per person per day at 60°C, equivalent to 54 litres at 40°C with cold water at 15°C.

Setting the demand basis before talking about collectors

Why the solar ratio differs from the conventional sizing ratio

The SOCOL sheet says it explicitly: solar sizing ratios differ from the values used for a conventional DHW generation system. Solar is preheat, and there is always a backup that reaches the setpoint. Solar input is therefore sized on the low end of the demand range, and the backup on peak demand. Confusing the two produces an oversized collector array and an undersized backup.

The demand basis in housing

In housing, the SOCOL sheet uses 30 litres per person per day at 60°C, a figure equivalent to 54 litres per person per day at 40°C with cold water at 15°C. That value is conservative by construction, since it comes from a synthesis of the low ends of demand observed across the country. The building's real demand, the one used to size the backup, is calculated separately and is the subject of calculating DHW demand for a multi-occupancy building.

The measurement that replaces the ratio

As soon as a measurement campaign is possible, it takes precedence over the ratio. Some funding schemes make it mandatory. Be careful with the interpretation: abnormally low consumption often reveals a fault rather than frugality. A slow, badly set or leaking mixing valve, combined with a backup running too hot or an excessive loop flow, causes cold water ingress that bypasses the hot water meter on a significant share of draws.

The table of pre-sizing ratios

Solar store volume

The store volume is taken equal to the minimum monthly daily consumption, noted Vminmonthly. The choice of month is decisive: favour spring or autumn months, because summer consumption in housing is often very low and would lead to a false sizing.

Collector area by region

Geographic situation Vminmonthly to estimated area ratio
Northern third of France 40 to 45 l/m²
Central third of France 50 to 75 l/m²
Southern third of France 70 to 100 l/m²

The area obtained is a pre-sizing value, valid for a 45° tilt and a 0° south orientation. It has to be carried into a sizing package such as SOLO 2018 to optimise the useful solar fraction, using the seasonal variation of the cold water temperature.

Uplift when solar also feeds the secondary return

Distribution energy assumption Case covered Collector area uplift Store volume
Qdis = 0.6 × QDHW New buildings + 10% unchanged
Qdis = 1 × QDHW Existing buildings + 30% unchanged

The real ratio between secondary return losses and DHW demand generally sits between 0.6 and 1.5. An area uplift requires the primary circuit to be uprated accordingly, in flow rate and heat exchanger, failing which the extra collectors produce nothing usable. The levers for cutting those losses are covered in DHW secondary return.

Checking the collector array against the real site

Orientation, tilt and departure from reference conditions

The ratios are given for 45° tilt and due south. Any departure is corrected in the sizing package, not by a rule of three on the table. Survey the roof's real orientation, its tilt and the area genuinely available in one piece, allowing for access routes and fixings.

Shading and obstructions

A close obstruction weighs more than an imperfect orientation. Survey chimneys, roof structures, stacks, aerials, trees and neighbouring buildings, with a shading survey taken at several times of day rather than one. A compact, clear array produces more than a spread-out one routed around an obstacle, because the primary pipe length and its losses grow with the spread.

Technology choice and stagnation risk

Flat plate collectors suit standard roofs with a good cost to performance ratio. Evacuated tubes make sense where the area is constrained or higher temperatures are targeted. On applications with reduced or nil summer occupancy, the question of solar itself comes before the question of technology, and drainback solutions or specific collectors are then needed to guard against overheating.

Hydraulics, controls and commissioning

Primary loop, exchanger and store

The robust scheme rests on a glycol primary loop and an exchanger into the solar store, whose fluid is checked on freezing point and pH rather than on a calendar. Take care with stratification in the solar cylinder: well placed connections, low velocities, and a layout that does not introduce backup-heated water into the preheated zone. Solar preheat is only worth anything if the backup does not warm the bottom of the cylinder.

Do not raise the backup setpoint

This is the rule most often broken. Raising the backup setpoint directly penalises solar input, since the collector array then works against an already hot cylinder. The backup setpoint is fixed at the level required by hygiene and comfort, not above. Insulating the whole of the generation, storage and distribution system belongs to the same family of decisions.

Commissioning and monitoring

Commissioning is what turns a collector array into useful kWh. Check the temperature differential that starts the primary pump, the dissipation or shutdown behaviour under stagnation, the balancing of the return risers, and the backup priorities. Plan a check at one or two months with readings, then monthly monitoring of the real solar fraction on the meters installed.

Costing, evidencing and getting a decision

The sizing note to attach to the file

Set out in writing the demand basis used in litres per person per day, the temperature it is expressed at, the minimum consumption month used, the regional ratio applied, any uplift for the secondary return, and the package used for the optimisation. Date and version it. Where a discrepancy appears on site, record the correction and its effect on the area and on the expected solar fraction.

Placing solar within the wider project

Solar is not chosen against a generator but with it, since it only ever preheats. The choice of generation architecture and backup generator is handled in communal DHW generation, and the arbitration between families of systems is usefully supported by a decision matrix.

Preparing the file with Argile

With Argile you build several work plans from the same survey, with the demand assumptions made explicit and the net cost shown once grants and scheme payments are deducted. The file comes out dated, comparable and defensible, which is exactly what a decision-making body needs before committing to works whose performance will only be measured two years later.

Key figures

40 to 100 L/m²

Volume to collector area ratio

85 to 90%

Useful fraction in the critical month

30 L/person/day

Solar sizing basis at 60°C

Frequently asked questions

On the minimum monthly daily consumption, not on the annual average. The SOCOL 2021 sheet recommends taking the minimum consumption volumes observed in spring or autumn as the calculation basis, because summer consumption can be very low in housing, particularly with holiday absences. A store sized on the annual average leads to an oversized collector array and to summer overheating.

Share this article

Louis Airy

Louis is COO of Argile. After four years in strategy consulting and close to two as chief of staff in home adaptation and reuse, he joined Argile in March 2024. In daily contact with certified renovation companies, he follows French energy saving certificates, renovation subsidies and reduced VAT, and revises the affected articles whenever a rate changes. What he writes is what he then checks against real quotes.

Further reading

Camille Martin

/

Works plan

/

Financing

Whole-house retrofit

Generate the quote

Works

Financing

Cost of works and grants

Total cost of works

4 jobs

INSULATION

External wall insulation

18 400,00 €

Windows

3 260,00 €

HEATING AND HOT WATER

Air-to-water heat pump

14 900,00 €

Heat-recovery ventilation

1 840,00 €

Total amount

38 400 €

Grants

3 grants

MaPrimeRénov’

9 200,00 €

Energy saving certificates

3 480,00 €

Regional grant

1 520,00 €

Add a grant

Total grants

− 14 200 €

Remaining cost

Cost of works

38 400 €

Grants deducted

− 14 200 €

Grants land once the works are done: the financing plan covers the advance.

Remaining cost

24 200 €

Financing plan

How the works are paid for before the grants land at the end of the site

Loans

1 loan

Prêt Ecair

24 200 € · 15 ans · 3,4 %

Instalment

212 €

Ecair

Empruntis

Sofinco

Total borrowed

24 200 €

Advances on the grants

3 grants

The grants are advanced to the customer so they do not wait for the end of the works.

MaPrimeRénov’

9 200,00 €

Energy saving certificates

3 480,00 €

Regional grant

1 520,00 €

Total advanced

14 200 €

Personal contribution

No contribution asked on this project

Total contributed

0 €

With argile

The out-of-pocket cost, announced without nasty surprises

Public grants, energy-saving certificate bonuses and financing built into the pricing: the customer sees the real cost of their project, what is left to pay and their monthly instalments before signing.

Energy renovationMay 11, 2026
Communal DHW generation: which systems for multi-occupancy buildings?

Choosing a communal DHW system is two separate decisions: the distribution architecture, which sets the losses, and the generator, which sets the cost per kWh. Secondary return losses commonly run at 60 to 150% of the DHW demand itself, which weighs more than the efficiency gap between two generators.

5 min read

ContractorsApril 25, 2026
Combined solar system (CSS): solar heating and DHW

When a client wants to heat the house and produce hot water with the same installation, you're the one who has to quickly separate promises from job-site reality. With the right configuration, you can aim for concrete savings on the bill, without complicating maintenance or overloading the boiler room. Here's a rundown of the choices that really matter, from sizing to connection.

5 min read

Reveal your expertise

One demo, and you see your expertise proven.

Contact us