Blog/Guarantees of Origin: answering a customer about the green offer
Contractors

October 20, 2026

•

5 min read

Guarantees of Origin: explaining a green offer to customers (without overselling traceability)

A Guarantee of Origin certifies, via a registry, that 1 MWh of renewable electricity has been injected into the grid, but it does not allow you to claim that the electron consumed by your customer is “green”: it is an accounting certificate, separate from physical flows. This framework is set at European level by Directive (EU) 2018/2001 (RED II) and, in France, by the Energy Code and the Guarantee of Origin scheme managed by Powernext. For an offer truly backed by production, rely on supply contracts or PPAs with an identified producer, and on the cancellation of GOs in the customer’s name, with traceability of the volume in MWh.

Contents

Understanding Guarantees of Origin in 2026: the mechanism made clear

Defining a Guarantee of Origin: the “certificate” linked to 1 MWh of renewable electricity

A Guarantee of Origin is an electronic certificate attached to 1 MWh of renewable electricity produced and injected into the grid. It contains administrative traceability data (technology, installation, production date). A useful point to remind a skeptical customer. The GO does not “follow” the electron. It documents an accounting balance.

Who issues and who records it: producers, registry, suppliers (simple reference points for answering questions)

The producer requests issuance on a dedicated registry. The registry records the issuance, transfers, and then the cancellation when the supplier uses it to substantiate an offer. Without cancellation, there is no enforceable “green” claim.

Electricity Guarantees of Origin: what the customer pays for and what the supplier actually finances

The customer pays for a kWh. The supplier finances the purchase of electricity and, separately, the purchase of Guarantees of Origin, which it cancels against the volumes sold. This mechanism proves a match over the year. It does not prove direct financing of new assets, unless it is an offer explicitly backed by identified production contracts.

Green electricity traceability: what the GO proves… and what it does not prove

Say it plainly: a GO does not trace the electron consumed at the meter

In your discussions, set the framework. The grid remains an instantaneous mix. A Guarantee of Origin certifies that 1 MWh of renewable electricity was produced and injected into the grid, then recorded and cancelled. No tracing of the electron to the meter.

What traceability does guarantee: accounting equivalence between renewable production and consumption

Traceability is based on accounting. For every MWh sold as “green,” a unique GO must be cancelled. Accounting equivalence can be checked through the registries. Guarantees of Origin prevent double counting and frame the “renewable electricity” claim.

Explain the real impact: contribution to the renewable market, but not “instant local electricity”

The main effect is economic. Purchasing GOs finances part of the value of producers, depending on the offer. Real impact when supply is documented. Long-term contracts, identified producers, label-type requirements. Otherwise, do not promise local supply or real-time matching. To go further on the measurable impact of renewable electricity in regulatory calculations, see the impact on the emission factor.

Electricity GO: recognizing a genuinely production-backed green offer

Guarantees of Origin prove that a volume of renewable electricity has been injected into the grid, but they do not allow you to trace the consumed electron. To speak of “backed” supply, look for a direct contract with a producer (or an appointed aggregator) and a long-term purchase. On the quote or annex, require identification of the production assets and the delivery period, not just the purchase of certificates.

New capacity vs existing assets: how to know whether the offer helps develop new projects

An offer can rely on existing plants without financing new assets. To assess “additionality,” ask whether part of the volumes is covered by long-term PPAs, whether the producer is under construction, and whether the supplier publishes an annual reporting of volumes. Failing that, you are mostly selling a documentary offsetting approach.

Simple criteria to ask the supplier for: origin (France/Europe), type of installation, age, volume transparency

Ask three simple questions. Geographical origin of the GOs (France or Europe) and country of issuance. Type of installations (hydro, wind, PV, biomass) and commissioning year. Finally, transparency: volumes purchased, volumes allocated, allocation method by site. With these elements, you can answer the customer confidently, backed by figures.

Responding to a skeptical customer: useful phrases and examples that make sense

Reframe the objection without putting yourself at fault: “you’re right about physical traceability”

You can answer simply. You’re right: you do not track the electron across the grid. The promise of an offer with Guarantees of Origin is accounting and documentary traceability, not the physical separation of flows. Your role is to frame the scope, what is proven, and what is not.

Use a clear comparison: “like a receipt” or “a production ticket” to explain the GO

Explain that a GO works like a receipt. For every 1 MWh produced from a renewable source, a certificate is issued. When it is allocated to a customer, it is cancelled. The customer is not buying “that electron”; they are buying proof that an equivalent quantity was produced.

Offer the customer a decision grid: GO-only offer, backed offer, or a mix depending on budget and objectives

Set out a clear grid, without making accusations. The goal is to align the sales pitch with the level of ambition. To go further on how to respond to objections in meetings, rely on a structured sales argument framework.

  • GO-only offer. Administrative proof, contained cost, ideal for a basic approach.
  • Backed offer. Identified producer, contract or dedicated allocation, clearer impact.
  • Mix. GO foundation, backed supplement on a defined share, to stay within budget.

Avoiding the trap of a dispute: staying factual, educational, and cautious

What you can say without accusing: rely on definitions and the notion of accounting equivalence

Stay with the facts. A so-called “green” offer is most often based on Guarantees of Origin attached to a kWh volume. They prove that renewable production was injected into the grid and that an equivalent volume is “allocated” via a certificate. This is accounting equivalence, not physical traceability electron by electron.

Avoid risky wording: no “fake green offer”, prefer “different level of commitment”

Avoid words that accuse or suggest deception. Prefer neutral comparisons. Between two offers, people often speak of a different level of commitment. Some are limited to cancelling certificates. Others add a contractual link to production assets, or explicit financing of new capacity.

Good practices for your quotes and discussions: clear wording, measurable promises, documents to keep

In your quotes and meeting notes, keep to a simple line. Describe what is provided and what can be verified. Promise only measurable elements. To frame your written materials, you can also rely on best practices and prepare a compliant quote.

  • State the scope. Volume in kWh, period, and certificate cancellation method.
  • Qualify the stated origin. France, Europe, or a mix, depending on the supporting documents provided.
  • Keep the T&Cs, offer sheets, cancellation certificates, invoices, and dated exchanges.

Key figures

1 MWh

Certificate per MWh

4

Stakeholders involved

3

Key GO steps

Frequently asked questions

You can direct your customer to the national Guarantees of Origin register, where issuance, transfers and, above all, cancellation of GOs are recorded. It is the cancellation that makes the “green offer” claim enforceable; without cancellation, the GO cannot justify the sale of renewable electricity.

Share this article

Pierre-Louis Guhur

Pierre-Louis is CEO and co-founder of Argile. He holds a PhD in machine learning, written at Inria, and renovated a house with his own hands in 2017 before founding the company. On the blog he writes about what he implements in the software: the 3CL-DPE 2021 method, NF EN 12831 and building physics as a calculation engine has to handle them, assumption by assumption.

Further reading

ContractorsMarch 22, 2026
Economical heating systems: solutions to offer in 2026

In 2026, your clients want to lower their bill without losing comfort, and it's often you who has to separate promises from solutions that hold up on site. A well-sized heat pump, targeted insulation, simple controls, you can save money from day one. The idea is to offer something accurate, reliable and cost-effective, not to sell a dream.

5 min read

ContractorsJuly 21, 2026
Green value: how much does an energy renovation add?

When a client is still hesitant about renovating, keep it simple. A better-insulated, better-heated home means lower bills and a property that sells faster, often at a better price. For you, the tradesperson, that's a clear argument to put in the quote. You're not just selling works. You're securing the property's value, from the first viewing right through to resale.

5 min read

ContractorsMay 13, 2026
Extensive green roof: the lightest system

An extensive green roof weighs 60 to 180 daN/m² at maximum water capacity, for a growing layer of 4 to 15 cm, and applies only to roofs pitched at 20% or less. Those three figures from the professional rules, not the planting effect, decide whether the existing structure can take the build-up.

5 min read

Reveal your expertise

One demo, and you see your expertise proven.

Contact us